Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 4.1 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 4.1 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
806e9
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
85 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2020
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
10.02k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
9.22k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
2.04k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
4.31k (x0.85)
TOTAL
31.52k
25.6k (x0.81)
Multithread
3206R
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
21.75k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
20.51k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
4.97k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.56k (x1.13)
TOTAL
216.02k
52.78k (x0.24)
Performance/W
3206R
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4