Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i7-920
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the i7-920 gets 45.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.3 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the i7-920 gets 45.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.3 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
106a5
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2020
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
47.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.97k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
4.43k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.75k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
2.53k (x0.52)
TOTAL
17.32k
11.68k (x0.67)
Multithread
3206R
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
7.71k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
18.81k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
13.76k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
5.07k (x0.97)
TOTAL
103.77k
45.34k (x0.44)
Performance/W
3206R
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
59 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
145 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
349 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
657 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
1481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
920 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
846 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4