Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i7-860
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-860 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the i7-860 gets 49.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the i7-860 gets 49.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
106e5
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2020
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
19.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
75.43k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
2.15k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
4.87k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.82k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
3.13k (x0.65)
TOTAL
17.32k
12.97k (x0.75)
Multithread
3206R
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
8.24k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
21.63k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
14.65k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
5.02k (x0.97)
TOTAL
103.77k
49.54k (x0.48)
Performance/W
3206R
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
87 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
154 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
521 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
620 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
1405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
902 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
3741 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4