| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i7-5820K


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
306f2
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
85 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
15360 kB
Date
February 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
129.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.82k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
9.64k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
4.29k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
3.78k (x0.78)
TOTAL
17.32k
21.53k (x1.24)

Multithread

3206R

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
18.07k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
64.25k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
27.03k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
8.03k (x1.54)
TOTAL
103.77k
117.38k (x1.13)

Performance/W
3206R
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
838 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
1062 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4