Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i7-1065G7
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
706e5
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
214.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
28.19k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
22.13k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
10.32k (x4.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
14.17k (x2.79)
TOTAL
31.52k
74.82k (x2.37)
Multithread
3206R
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
86.39k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
86.22k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
32.99k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
8.75k (x1.78)
TOTAL
216.02k
214.34k (x0.99)
Performance/W
3206R
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
14289 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4