Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i5-4690
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.3 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.3 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
306c3
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
85 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2020
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
163.95k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
22.97k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
13.02k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
5.21k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
4.74k (x0.93)
TOTAL
31.52k
45.95k (x1.46)
Multithread
3206R
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
85.98k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
49.01k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
19.5k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
9.46k (x1.93)
TOTAL
216.02k
163.95k (x0.76)
Performance/W
3206R
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
1952 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4