Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0652
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
27.14k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
24.75k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
5.73k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
11.84k (x2.33)
TOTAL
31.52k
69.47k (x2.2)
Multithread
3206R
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
105.77k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
107.47k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
24.82k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
8.02k (x1.63)
TOTAL
216.02k
246.07k (x1.14)
Performance/W
3206R
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4