| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i5-10210U


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806ec
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
147.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
22.96k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
20.8k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
4.76k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
7.5k (x1.47)
TOTAL
31.52k
56.03k (x1.78)

Multithread

3206R

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
66.43k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
62.38k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
14.52k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.45k (x0.91)
TOTAL
216.02k
147.78k (x0.68)

Performance/W
3206R
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
9852 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4