Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Celeron J4105
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the J4105 gets 41.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the J4105 gets 41.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
706a1
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
85 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2020
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
61.49k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.68k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
5.29k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.75k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
3.44k (x0.71)
TOTAL
17.32k
13.16k (x0.76)
Multithread
3206R
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
6.39k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
20.02k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
10.22k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
4.94k (x0.95)
TOTAL
103.77k
41.57k (x0.4)
Performance/W
3206R
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
639 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
2002 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
494 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
4157 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
2116 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4