Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.5 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.5 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
860f01
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
February 2020
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
15.48k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
22.82k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
8.63k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
7.17k (x1.41)
TOTAL
31.52k
54.11k (x1.72)
Multithread
3206R
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
117.98k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
146.43k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
65.54k (x3.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.77k (x0.97)
TOTAL
216.02k
334.72k (x1.55)
Performance/W
3206R
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4