| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Ryzen 5 3550H


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.2 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
810f81
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
178.26k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.63k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
16.69k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
4.92k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
5k (x1.03)
TOTAL
17.32k
30.24k (x1.75)

Multithread

3206R

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
13.62k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
65.71k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
23.7k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
5.64k (x1.08)
TOTAL
103.77k
108.67k (x1.05)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
13.51k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
22.34k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
4.98k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
4.24k (x0.83)
TOTAL
31.52k
45.07k (x1.43)

Multithread

3206R

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
52.21k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
95.66k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
25.54k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.85k (x0.99)
TOTAL
216.02k
178.26k (x0.83)

Performance/W
3206R
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
5093 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4