Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.4 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.4 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
800f82
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
14.08k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
22.56k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
5.19k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
16.71k (x3.28)
TOTAL
31.52k
58.53k (x1.86)
Multithread
3206R
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
86.62k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
168.1k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
43.51k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.16k (x1.05)
TOTAL
216.02k
303.4k (x1.4)
Performance/W
3206R
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4