| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
810f81
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
168.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.89k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
17.94k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
5.34k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
6.62k (x1.37)
TOTAL
17.32k
33.79k (x1.95)

Multithread

3206R

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
15.07k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
66.84k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
19.56k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
6.54k (x1.26)
TOTAL
103.77k
108.01k (x1.04)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
14.48k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
23.84k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
5.43k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
5.46k (x1.07)
TOTAL
31.52k
49.21k (x1.56)

Multithread

3206R

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
54.39k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
88.77k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
20.04k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.48k (x1.12)
TOTAL
216.02k
168.69k (x0.78)

Performance/W
3206R
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4