| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.8 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
100fa0
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/6
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2020
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.98k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
4.57k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.57k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
3.51k (x0.73)
TOTAL
17.32k
12.64k (x0.73)

Multithread

3206R

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
11.86k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
27.4k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
15.39k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
3.46k (x0.66)
TOTAL
103.77k
58.11k (x0.56)

Performance/W
3206R
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
612 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4