| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i5-12400F


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.8 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
90675
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
85 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
18432 kB
Date
February 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
7.43k (x3.78)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
18.64k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
13.15k (x5.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
14.82k (x3.06)
TOTAL
17.32k
54.04k (x3.12)

Multithread

3206R

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
36.23k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
134.76k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
84.06k (x4.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
16.71k (x3.21)
TOTAL
103.77k
271.76k (x2.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
33.85k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
20.33k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
10.51k (x4.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
11.77k (x2.31)
TOTAL
31.52k
76.46k (x2.43)

Multithread

3206R

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
174.21k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
141.31k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
64.86k (x3.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
19.01k (x3.87)
TOTAL
216.02k
399.39k (x1.85)

Performance/W
3206R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4