| | | | | | |

Pentium N5000 vs Core i5-4210U


Description
The N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the i5-4210U gets 45.2 k points.

Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
40651
Core
Gemini Lake
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
17.27k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.76k points
57.58k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5000
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.12k
9.26k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
7.66k
8.2k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
3.57k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.92k (x1.72)
TOTAL
17.27k
23.95k (x1.39)

Multithread

N5000

i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.56k
17.53k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.71k
17.56k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
7.65k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.49k (x1.21)
TOTAL
54.76k
45.22k (x0.83)

Performance/W
N5000
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2927 points/W
1169 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
1171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
510 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
9127 points/W
3015 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5000
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1895 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2838 points/GHz
3038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1032 points/GHz
1322 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
1083 points/GHz
TOTAL
6396 points/GHz
8872 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4