| | | | | | |

Pentium N5000 vs Celeron J4105


Description
Both models N5000 and J4105 are based on Goldmont Plus architecture.

Goldmont Plus is a low power architecture intended for Atom, Celeron y Pentium Silver SoCs. It uses the 14nm process and come with the Gen9 Intel’s iGPU.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.1 times faster than the N5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
706a1
Core
Gemini Lake
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
17.27k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.76k points
61.49k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5000
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
5.12k
4.9k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
7.66k
7.26k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
2.75k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
3.32k (x1.95)
TOTAL
17.27k
18.22k (x1.06)

Multithread

N5000

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
17.56k
18.84k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
25.71k
27.45k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
10.35k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
4.85k (x2.37)
TOTAL
54.76k
61.49k (x1.12)

Performance/W
N5000
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2927 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
9127 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5000
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1895 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2838 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1032 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
6396 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4