Pentium N5000 vs Celeron N2840
Description
The N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 3.3 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 3.3 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
30678
Core
Gemini Lake
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
December 2017
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
17.27k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.76k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5000
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
5.12k
4.8k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
7.66k
2.47k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
1.86k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
1.22k (x0.72)
TOTAL
17.27k
10.36k (x0.6)
Multithread
N5000
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
17.56k
8.24k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.71k
4.19k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
3.05k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
1.32k (x0.64)
TOTAL
54.76k
16.79k (x0.31)
Performance/W
N5000
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
2927 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
9127 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5000
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1895 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2838 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1032 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
6396 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4