Pentium N5000 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.2 times faster than the N5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.2 times faster than the N5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
810f10
Core
Gemini Lake
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
17.27k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.76k points
71.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5000
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.12k
11.67k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
7.66k
14.02k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
4.53k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.93k (x1.72)
TOTAL
17.27k
33.14k (x1.92)
Multithread
N5000
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.56k
20.49k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
25.71k
31.32k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
9.99k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.03k (x1.48)
TOTAL
54.76k
64.82k (x1.18)
Performance/W
N5000
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2927 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
9127 points/W
4322 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5000
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1895 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2838 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1032 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
6396 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4