Pentium N5000 vs A9 9420
Description
The N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.9 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.9 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
670f00
Core
Gemini Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
17.27k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.76k points
46.33k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5000
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
5.12k
8.41k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
7.66k
11.48k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
3.29k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.24k (x1.31)
TOTAL
17.27k
25.41k (x1.47)
Multithread
N5000
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
17.56k
11.25k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.71k
13.69k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
2.09k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
1.87k (x0.91)
TOTAL
54.76k
28.89k (x0.53)
Performance/W
N5000
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2927 points/W
750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
139 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
9127 points/W
1926 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5000
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1895 points/GHz
2336 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2838 points/GHz
3188 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1032 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
621 points/GHz
TOTAL
6396 points/GHz
7058 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4