Pentium T3400 vs 4417U
Description
The T3400 is based on Core architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 2.8 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 2.8 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
806ea
Core
Merom-2M
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
October 2008
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
41.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T3400
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.49k
7.94k (x3.19)
Test#2 (FP)
2.25k
11.35k (x5.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
2.39k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
2.8k (x2.45)
TOTAL
8.05k
24.49k (x3.04)
Multithread
T3400
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
13.1k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
21.1k (x4.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
4.49k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
2.46k (x2.01)
TOTAL
14.91k
41.15k (x2.76)
Performance/W
T3400
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
142 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
127 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
426 points/W
2743 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
1150 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1002 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
526 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
3714 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4