| | | | | | |

Pentium Dual-Core E2180 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The E2180 is based on Core architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2180 gets a score of 13.1 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 7.9 times faster than the E2180 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
50657
Core
Allendale
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
11264 kB
Date
August 2007
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
7.55k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.89k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E2180
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2.01k
1.97k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
2.01k
8.15k (x4.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.02k
2.37k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.07k
4.84k (x4.54)
TOTAL
7.1k
17.32k (x2.44)

Multithread

E2180

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
15.73k (x3.95)
Test#2 (FP)
3.99k
64.78k (x16.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
18.06k (x4.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
5.21k (x4.82)
TOTAL
13.06k
103.77k (x7.95)

Performance/W
E2180
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
61 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
61 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
201 points/W
1221 points/W

Performance/GHz
E2180
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1004 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1004 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1011 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
533 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
3552 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4