| | | | | | |

Pentium Dual-Core E2180 vs Celeron E3300


Description
Both models E2180 and E3300 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2180 gets a score of 13.9 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.8 times faster than the E2180 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
1067a
Core
Allendale
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
August 2007
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7.55k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.89k points
24.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E2180
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.01k
2.29k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
2.01k
5.87k (x2.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.02k
2.49k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.07k
1.01k (x0.95)
TOTAL
7.1k
11.66k (x1.64)

Multithread

E2180

E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
4.57k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
3.99k
11.66k (x2.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
4.89k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
1.04k (x0.96)
TOTAL
13.06k
22.16k (x1.7)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E2180
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.31k
2.9k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
2.08k
6.38k (x3.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.59k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.06k
1.08k (x1.01)
TOTAL
7.55k
12.94k (x1.71)

Multithread

E2180

E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
5.76k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
4.11k
12.67k (x3.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
5.16k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.07k
1.01k (x0.95)
TOTAL
13.89k
24.6k (x1.77)

Performance/W
E2180
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
70 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
63 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
214 points/W
378 points/W

Performance/GHz
E2180
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1153 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1042 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
3777 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4