Pentium D 950 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5
Description
The 950 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 5.2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 5.2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f64
506e3
Core
Presler
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
130 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2006
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
8.73k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
7.34k points
37.88k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
950
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.59k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
3.94k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
1k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.86k
2k (x2.32)
TOTAL
8.73k
9.52k (x1.09)
Multithread
950
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
4.34k
10.4k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
16.64k (x8.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.75k
4.51k (x6)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.35k
6.33k (x18.17)
TOTAL
7.34k
37.88k (x5.16)
Performance/W
950
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
33 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
15 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
3 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
56 points/W
474 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
695 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
253 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
2567 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4