Pentium D 950 vs Pentium T3400
Description
The 950 is based on NetBurst architecture while the T3400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f64
6fd
Core
Presler
Merom-2M
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2006
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
8.73k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
7.34k points
14.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
950
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.49k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
2.25k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
2.17k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.86k
1.14k (x1.33)
TOTAL
8.73k
8.05k (x0.92)
Multithread
950
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.34k
4.98k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
4.43k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.75k
4.27k (x5.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.35k
1.23k (x3.52)
TOTAL
7.34k
14.91k (x2.03)
Performance/W
950
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
33 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
15 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
3 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
56 points/W
426 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
695 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
253 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
2567 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4