Pentium D 950 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Description
The 950 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E2200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E2200 is 2.1 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E2200 is 2.1 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f64
6fd
Core
Presler
Allendale
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2006
December 2007
Mean monothread perf.
8.73k points
8.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
7.34k points
15.44k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
950
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.53k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
2.3k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
2.31k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.86k
1.16k (x1.36)
TOTAL
8.73k
8.29k (x0.95)
Multithread
950
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.34k
5.06k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
4.58k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.75k
4.61k (x6.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.35k
1.18k (x3.39)
TOTAL
7.34k
15.44k (x2.1)
Performance/W
950
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
33 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
15 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
3 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
56 points/W
237 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
695 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/GHz
1048 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
253 points/GHz
529 points/GHz
TOTAL
2567 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4