Pentium D 950 vs Celeron J3455
Description
The 950 is based on NetBurst architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 6.5 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 6.5 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f64
506c9
Core
Presler
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
130 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
January 2006
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
8.73k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
7.34k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
950
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
6.02k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
3.49k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
2.01k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.86k
1.47k (x1.71)
TOTAL
8.73k
12.98k (x1.49)
Multithread
950
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
4.34k
23.7k (x5.46)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
13.75k (x7.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.75k
7.8k (x10.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.35k
2.09k (x5.99)
TOTAL
7.34k
47.34k (x6.45)
Performance/W
950
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
33 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
15 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
3 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
56 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
695 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
253 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
2567 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4