Pentium D 950 vs Celeron J1900
Description
The 950 is based on NetBurst architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 4.5 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 4.5 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f64
30679
Core
Presler
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
130 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
January 2006
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
8.73k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
7.34k points
33.25k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
950
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
4.58k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
2.32k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
1.72k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.86k
1.14k (x1.32)
TOTAL
8.73k
9.75k (x1.12)
Multithread
950
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.34k
17.16k (x3.96)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
8.42k (x4.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.75k
6.22k (x8.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.35k
1.44k (x4.15)
TOTAL
7.34k
33.25k (x4.53)
Performance/W
950
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
33 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
15 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
3 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
56 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
695 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
253 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
2567 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4