Pentium D 950 vs C Series C-60
Description
The 950 is based on NetBurst architecture while the C-60 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the C-60 is 1.2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the C-60 is 1.2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f64
500f20
Core
Presler
Ontario
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.33 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
130 W
9 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x512 kB
Date
January 2006
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
8.73k points
4.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
7.34k points
8.53k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
950
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
1.32k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
1.94k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
1.07k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.86k
0.45k (x0.53)
TOTAL
8.73k
4.79k (x0.55)
Multithread
950
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
4.34k
2.36k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
3.52k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.75k
1.92k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.35k
0.73k (x2.11)
TOTAL
7.34k
8.53k (x1.16)
Performance/W
950
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
33 points/W
262 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
15 points/W
391 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6 points/W
213 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
3 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
56 points/W
948 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
695 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
253 points/GHz
342 points/GHz
TOTAL
2567 points/GHz
3599 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4