| | | |

Pentium D 925 vs Celeron M 575


Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the 575 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 575 gets 0 k points.

Summarizing, the 925 is INF times faster than the 575. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
6fd
Core
Presler
Meron
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
1/1
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
October 2006
August 2008

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
925
575
Test#1 (Integers)
1521
1994 (31.12%)
Test#2 (FP)
2948
1999 (-32.22%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1506
1904 (26.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
816
900 (10.26%)
TOTAL
6791
6797 (0.08%)

Multithread

925

575
Test#1 (Integers)
2982
0 (-100.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
5616
0 (-100.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2870
0 (-100.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
819
0 (-100.00%)
TOTAL
12287
0 (-100.00%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
575
Test#1 (Integers)
2059
2303 (11.85%)
Test#2 (FP)
3316
2002 (-39.63%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522
2070 (36.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
799
900 (12.63%)
TOTAL
7696
7275 (-5.47%)

Multithread

925

575
Test#1 (Integers)
3995
0 (-100.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
6318
0 (-100.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2905
0 (-100.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
808
0 (-100.00%)
TOTAL
14027
0 (-100.00%)

Performance/W
925
575
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
0 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
0 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
0 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
0 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
0 points/W

Performance/GHz
925
575
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
450 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8