Pentium D 820 vs Celeron N3060
Description
The 820 is based on NetBurst architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 820 gets a score of 14.1 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 820 is 1.1 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 820 gets a score of 14.1 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 820 is 1.1 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f44
406c4
Core
Smithfield
Braswell
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
130 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
May 2005
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
7.45k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.07k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
820
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1.93k
4.68k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
3.11k
2.74k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.49k
1.83k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
0.9k (x1)
TOTAL
7.45k
10.15k (x1.36)
Multithread
820
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
3.92k
6.31k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
6.23k
3.68k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.99k
2.46k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
0.91k (x0.97)
TOTAL
14.07k
13.36k (x0.95)
Performance/W
820
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
30 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
48 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
7 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
108 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
820
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
690 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1112 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
534 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
324 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
2660 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4