| | | | | | |

Pentium N3540 vs Xeon E5506


Description
The N3540 is based on Silvermont architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3540 gets a score of 37.5 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.4 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
30678
106a5
Core
Bay Trail-M
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
7,5 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2014
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.72k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.5k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3540
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1.37k
1.21k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
2k
2.75k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.95k
1.94k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
0.78k (x0.64)
TOTAL
6.53k
6.68k (x1.02)

Multithread

N3540

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
5.24k
12.25k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
7.69k
25.55k (x3.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
17.1k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.52k
5.01k (x3.3)
TOTAL
21.76k
59.9k (x2.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3540
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.97k
4.48k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
2.58k
2.99k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.98k
1.81k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
0.69k (x0.58)
TOTAL
10.72k
9.97k (x0.93)

Multithread

N3540

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
18.92k
41k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
9.67k
28.17k (x2.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
17.4k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
3.88k (x2.52)
TOTAL
37.5k
90.45k (x2.41)

Performance/W
N3540
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2703 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1382 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
5357 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3540
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1864 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
967 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
4020 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4