Pentium N3540 vs Core i5-3337U
Description
The N3540 is based on Silvermont architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3540 gets a score of 21.8 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1.5 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3540 gets a score of 21.8 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1.5 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30678
306a9
Core
Bay Trail-M
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
7,5 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2014
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
10.72k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.5k points
48.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3540
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.37k
2.55k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
2k
7.24k (x3.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.95k
3.26k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
3.37k (x2.78)
TOTAL
6.53k
16.42k (x2.51)
Multithread
N3540
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.24k
5.03k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
7.69k
14.79k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
7.37k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.52k
4.53k (x2.99)
TOTAL
21.76k
31.72k (x1.46)
Performance/W
N3540
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
749 points/W
296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1098 points/W
870 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1045 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
267 points/W
TOTAL
3109 points/W
1866 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3540
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
515 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
749 points/GHz
2682 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
455 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
2448 points/GHz
6080 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4