| | | | | | |

Pentium N3530 vs Xeon E5504


Description
The N3530 is based on Silvermont architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3530 gets a score of 34.6 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.

Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.2 times faster than the N3530. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
30678
106a5
Core
Bay Trail-M
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.58 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
7,5 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2014
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.44k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
34.57k points
41.95k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3530
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
4.86k
4.57k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
2.5k
3.07k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.82k
1.85k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
1.43k (x1.13)
TOTAL
10.44k
10.92k (x1.05)

Multithread

N3530

E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
17.22k
19.07k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
8.89k
12.52k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.89k
7.97k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
2.39k (x1.52)
TOTAL
34.57k
41.95k (x1.21)

Performance/W
N3530
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
2460 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
984 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
4938 points/W
524 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3530
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
967 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
707 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
488 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
4047 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4