Pentium G4560 vs Core i7-920
Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
47.2k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
6.12k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
4.76k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
2.78k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
2.67k (x0.36)
TOTAL
44.21k
16.33k (x0.37)
Multithread
G4560
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
19.26k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
14.96k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
8.05k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
4.92k (x0.69)
TOTAL
89.91k
47.2k (x0.52)
Performance/W
G4560
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
115 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
363 points/W
Performance/GHz
G4560
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
2044 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
1591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
930 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4