Pentium G4560 vs Core i7-7700HQ
Description
Both models G4560 and i7-7700HQ are based on Kaby Lake architecture.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 167.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.9 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 167.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.9 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
906e9
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
208.33k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
13.75k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
19.69k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.19k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
8.92k (x1.21)
TOTAL
44.21k
47.55k (x1.08)
Multithread
G4560
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
52.55k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
86.47k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
23.02k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
5.4k (x0.75)
TOTAL
89.91k
167.43k (x1.86)
Performance/W
G4560
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
1922 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
511 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
3721 points/W
Performance/GHz
G4560
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3620 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
2347 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
12514 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4