| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Core i7-6820HQ


Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i7-6820HQ gets 152.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.7 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
506e3
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
50.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
205.89k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
11.54k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
16.69k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
4.51k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
7.27k (x0.98)
TOTAL
44.21k
40.01k (x0.91)

Multithread

G4560

i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
48.5k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
77.02k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
21.3k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
5.24k (x0.73)
TOTAL
89.91k
152.06k (x1.69)

Performance/W
G4560
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
1711 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
3379 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
4635 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
2020 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
11114 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4