| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Core i5-7200U


Description
Both models G4560 and i5-7200U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806e9
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
97.52k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
11.39k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
16.47k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
4.36k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
5.21k (x0.7)
TOTAL
44.21k
37.43k (x0.85)

Multithread

G4560

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
23.57k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
37.4k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
10.15k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
4.78k (x0.67)
TOTAL
89.91k
75.9k (x0.84)

Performance/W
G4560
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
1572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
5060 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3674 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5313 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
12073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4