| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Core i5-10500


Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i5-10500 gets 288.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 3.2 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
54 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
387.99k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
16.3k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
23.22k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
6.22k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
14.05k (x1.9)
TOTAL
44.21k
59.79k (x1.35)

Multithread

G4560

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
92.61k (x3.4)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
147.68k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
40.71k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
7.78k (x1.09)
TOTAL
89.91k
288.77k (x3.21)

Performance/W
G4560
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
1425 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
2272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
626 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
4443 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3623 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5160 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1381 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
3123 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
13287 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4