| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.

Summarizing, the G4560 is 1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
142.69k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
7.07k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
10.55k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.27k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
5.66k (x0.77)
TOTAL
44.21k
28.56k (x0.65)

Multithread

G4560

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
25.28k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
37.48k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
17.77k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
6.92k (x0.97)
TOTAL
89.91k
87.45k (x0.97)

Performance/W
G4560
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
5830 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4