| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.6 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
171.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
12.89k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
18.55k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
9.93k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
9.54k (x1.29)
TOTAL
44.21k
50.91k (x1.15)

Multithread

G4560

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
50.06k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
66.1k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
20.24k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
5.51k (x0.77)
TOTAL
89.91k
141.91k (x1.58)

Performance/W
G4560
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
9461 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4