Pentium G4560 vs Core i3-8100
Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-8100 gets 152.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.7 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-8100 gets 152.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.7 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
906eb
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
54 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
200.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
13.51k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
19.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.06k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
7.87k (x1.06)
TOTAL
44.21k
45.81k (x1.04)
Multithread
G4560
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
52.88k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
75.92k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
19.52k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
4.53k (x0.63)
TOTAL
89.91k
152.86k (x1.7)
Performance/W
G4560
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
814 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
300 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
2352 points/W
Performance/GHz
G4560
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3753 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
12725 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4