Pentium G4560 vs Core i3-7100
Description
Both models G4560 and i3-7100 are based on Kaby Lake architecture.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-7100 gets 94.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.1 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-7100 gets 94.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.1 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
906e9
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
124.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
14.04k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
20.55k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.41k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
3.99k (x0.54)
TOTAL
44.21k
43.99k (x0.99)
Multithread
G4560
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
30.09k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
47.84k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
13.13k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
3.52k (x0.49)
TOTAL
89.91k
94.59k (x1.05)
Performance/W
G4560
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
590 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
938 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
69 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
1855 points/W
Performance/GHz
G4560
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3601 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5268 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
11279 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4