| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
106.58k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
14.3k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
20.09k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.23k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
4.24k (x0.57)
TOTAL
44.21k
43.87k (x0.99)

Multithread

G4560

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
25.51k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
41.33k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
10.81k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
3.21k (x0.45)
TOTAL
89.91k
80.85k (x0.9)

Performance/W
G4560
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
1700 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
2755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
5390 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
4901 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
10699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4