Pentium G4560 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
100fa0
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Thuban
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
54 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
5.17k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
5.33k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
2.76k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
3.51k (x0.47)
TOTAL
44.21k
16.77k (x0.38)
Multithread
G4560
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
29.82k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
30.79k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
15.88k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
3.69k (x0.52)
TOTAL
89.91k
80.19k (x0.89)
Performance/W
G4560
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
G4560
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4