| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.1 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
137.96k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
12.9k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
21.4k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
10.73k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
8.16k (x1.1)
TOTAL
44.21k
53.19k (x1.2)

Multithread

G4560

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
30.31k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
45.13k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
20.17k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
5.77k (x0.81)
TOTAL
89.91k
101.38k (x1.13)

Performance/W
G4560
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
3621 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4