Pentium G3260 vs Xeon X3430
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.1 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.1 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
106e5
Core
Haswell
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
53 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2015
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
55.66k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
6.41k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
4.27k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.38k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.67k (x0.7)
TOTAL
30.56k
15.74k (x0.51)
Multithread
G3260
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
25.19k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
16.76k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
9.33k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
4.37k (x0.67)
TOTAL
58.89k
55.66k (x0.95)
Performance/W
G3260
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
586 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4