Pentium G3260 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 10.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 10.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
306e4
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
12 /24
TDP
53 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
633.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
10.64k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
9.53k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.12k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.62k (x0.94)
TOTAL
30.56k
27.91k (x0.91)
Multithread
G3260
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
252.69k (x10.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
238.68k (x11.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
115.5k (x13.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
10.98k (x1.67)
TOTAL
58.89k
617.84k (x10.49)
Performance/W
G3260
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
1944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
1836 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
888 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
4753 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
2722 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
7973 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4