Pentium G3260 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.1 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.1 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
53 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
237.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
8.22k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
12.06k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.01k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.89k (x0.75)
TOTAL
30.56k
27.18k (x0.89)
Multithread
G3260
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
61.34k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
90.21k (x4.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
26.2k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
4.62k (x0.71)
TOTAL
58.89k
182.37k (x3.1)
Performance/W
G3260
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
2146 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4