Pentium G3260 vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 2.3 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 2.3 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
10676
Core
Haswell
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
53 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
3k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
6.62k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.55k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.6k (x0.94)
TOTAL
30.56k
15.77k (x0.52)
Multithread
G3260
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
5.83k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
12.64k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
4.97k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
1.95k (x0.3)
TOTAL
58.89k
25.39k (x0.43)
Performance/W
G3260
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4